compile latex file using a makefile in windows

#Compile latex file using a makefile in windows how to

o added, of course), so that Make can use the built-in rules for linking. It helps if one of the object files is named the same as the executable (with. $() $^ $(LOADLIBES) $(LDLIBS) -o could avoid writing our own rules if we just build in the current working directory (which could be a build directory parallel to the source, if we use VPATH to locate the sources). $(BIN)/$(EXECUTABLE_NAME): $(OBJECT_FILES) OBJECT_FILES=$(addprefix $(OBJ)/, $(OBJECTS))

We can copy our build rules from the standard built-in rules (examine using make -f /dev/null -print-data-base | grep -Fw -e -e ): OBJECTS += main.o To this end, we should just define a list of object files - the list of source files is used only to generate this list, so that's redundant. We probably want Make to just create objects as needed, by making the executable program depend on the specific object files it needs. This rule doesn't do what it claims: create_objects: 'Created objects.' We're not even consistent with the use of progress echo commands - some run before the build commands, and some afterwards. You'll also want normal output when you use make -n to preview what commands will run. The most visible project that does this is the Linux kernel, and it is careful to provide an opt-out (by setting KBUILD_VERBOSE, if I remember correctly) so that the normal output is available when necessary. Using to hide the build commands can make it harder to debug failing builds (hiding non-build commands such as echo is fine). o -p ^^^ $(CFLAGS) -o ^^^ Use $(CFLAGS), not $(LDFLAGS), when compiling. $(OBJECT_FILES): $(OBJ)/%.o: Compiling ^^^ Your terminology is weird: you 'compile a. $(EXECUTABLE_FILES): $(LDFLAGS) -o ^^^ 'Build successful!' Rm -r -f ^^^ I don't recommend suppressing the echoing of the command using # ^^^ A more succinct expression for $(OBJECT_FILES), using # Replacing everything that you told me not to touch. Other than the major problems cited above, I have also noted many minor issues in the comments. The main remedy is to specify real targets and real dependencies, rather than phony labels like create_executable. Having thus falsely satisfied the prerequisites for create_executable, it proceeds to attempt to link the executable, even if any of the $(OBJECT_FILES) is missing. That's a false claim due to the error above. Once all of the $(SOURCE_FILES) are present, it echoes 'Created objects.'.For any of the $(SOURCE_FILES) that is missing, it 'creates' it using the %.cpp: rule, which actually tries to compile the missing.For create_objects, it just verifies that all of the source files are present.In an attempt to create a file called create_directories, it runs mkdir -p $(OBJ).įor create_executable, it needs to rebuild create_objects.

It will try to create the prerequisites of build, namely create_directories and create_executable, neither of which are names of existing files. On the other hand, it might fail to recompile some source files into object files. As a result, it will always relink the executable, even when everything is already up to date. You are not using the make system properly. This makefile works, I just want to make sure I'm doing everything correctly. OBJECT_FILES=$(addprefix $(OBJ)/, $(SOURCE_FILES.cpp=.o))īuild: create_directories 'Build successful!'Ĭreate_executable: $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJECT_FILES) -o 'Created executable.'Ĭreate_objects: 'Created -p 'Compiling $(LDFLAGS) -c -o $(OBJ)/$(patsubst -r -f $(BIN)

#Compile latex file using a makefile in windows how to

I'm trying to learn how to use makefiles, and this is my attempt at making a makefile that compiles source files in a source directory (src/) into object files that are created in a bin directory.